Close To The Edge
Best song: Close To The
Edge
Worst song: …you cannot
be serious. Oh, fine then, And You And I
Overall grade: 7
There are albums I think
are better than this one. Not very many, but they do exist – often those that
are more coherent i.e. are so great because the whole is greater than the sum
of the parts. But I cannot think of one single album that has less flaws than
Yes’ 1972 masterpiece here. (Many would agree: it has over 2000 5 star ratings
on ProgArchives.com)
However, I believe I am
supposed to be objective while writing this and so I’ve tried very hard to find
some negative aspects to comment on in order to show I’ve considered both
sides. Here’s what I came up with:
1.
It’s too good. Sometimes
it’s just far too much awesomeness to cope with in one sitting so I have to
split it up into individual songs. When I do listen to the complete album, it
basically spoils me for all other music for the rest of the day.
2.
Yeah, that’s all I got.
I can actually
understand why someone wouldn’t like this album. I’ve never read a truly
negative review of it (though I’d be interested to, so if you know of one…) but
it’s hardly everyone’s thing; as whether or not you like it depends on your
priorities regarding music. It’s very much an album to listen to. If you just
have it on in the background, half-listening while doing something else, it
sounds like random noise. It’s complicated and you have to pay attention to
make sense of it. A lot of people don’t like that in music and I think that’s
fair enough – there’s only a certain number of hours in the day and not
everyone wants to spend them solely on music. It also hasn’t got lyrics you can
particularly relate to, a beat you can dance to or anything that’s likely to
make you shed a tear, unless you’re really really moved by Bill Bruford’s
drumming.
But it’s technically
perfect and the structure and writing of the title track is flawless. Let me
break it down: some very quiet bird noises grow louder and eventually segue
into some fairly soothing outdoor music before the faster guitar crash in and
the band dissolves into a fast, complicated, slightly jazzy instrumental piece,
with a couple of minute pauses for Jon Anderson to let out an ‘aaaah!’ Then, at
around the 3 minute mark, he gives the band a cue to change direction into a
more structured, symphonic section which lasts until Bill Bruford gives us a
great drum line and Jon starts to sing the first verse, at which point the
music picks up pace again. For a short instrumental break and the chorus, the
instruments become rougher and choppier until a wonderful swirling organ comes
in and a couple of backing singers add lovely harmonies. This fades and the
volume goes down, some rhythmic drums keeping the pulse for a while but then
coming to a stop, leaving us with just some calming naturesque sounds, like the
dripping water sound effects and the atmospheric music. But as we pass the
halfway point the organ comes back in and begins to build things back up,
joined after a while by some far off soft vocals which carry us through to a
much quieter part of the song that feels very melancholy. Jon’s voice shows a
rare emotion and the music just envelopes you completely. A few drum taps count
the band in and then we’re back in a more excited freeform style where everyone
present is displaying their best-ever musicianship. A bombastic and triumphant
chorus comes out to finish it off and we revisit the original theme to tie
everything up before the instruments gently fade out, returning to the simple
tweeting of birds that we first heard, and that’s your song.
It’s not like a sidelong
that’s a bunch of short songs strung together with connecting pieces, this is
very much a single track, and everything is timed to perfection. But as if
hearing that wasn’t enough to change your world, we have two more songs to go!
Neither of them try to be the first, there’s the more acoustic ‘And You And I’
that’s almost folky in places, and the hard rock-influenced ‘Siberian Khatru’
which is great except it just fades out to silence at the end, making it kind
of a boring finish to the album. But after 38 mindblowing minutes, it’s not
much to complain about.
I also like the cover
art. It’s green! But not plain green, a range of shades. What does it
symbolise? Is it the earth becoming shrouded in darkness? Is it Roger Dean
running out of red paint again? Is it an unused design for one of Rick Wakeman’s
capes? For something that doesn’t have a real picture, I look at it for far too
long.
Even if it doesn’t sound
like your thing, I think you should listen to this record once in your life
just to experience it. It’s the pinnacle of Yes and of everything classic prog
tried to achieve, and it’s not just a record, it’s an experience; a musical
rite of passage.
" unless you’re really really moved by Bill Bruford’s drumming." I don't know about you, but those big snare hits on Eclipse/Apocalypse bring tears to MY eyes. lol
ReplyDelete"Is it an unused design for one of Rick Wakeman’s capes? " Nah green just wasn't his color.
Actually, the cover kind of reminds me of one of those staring posters where random shapes and figures are supposed to jump out at you. If you're farsighted it doesn't work, sadly.
Seriously, probably the perfect Yes album. I actually prefer Khatru over the title track. I like that rocking groove, and I've always thought Howe's opening riff sounds like Hendrix's opening riff for Hey Joe. Plus the harmonies are great. Also, those "Ba-na-NA-nu Na-nu" vocals on the coda sound like Christopher Cross' Ride Like the Wind. So they plagiarized and trailblazed on this one:)
And You and I: I had a college friend who thought this was the greatest thing they ever did, but while I think it's pleasant, it's nothing as the crazy and fun as the other 2. I also never saw the need for dividing it into four sections, it's basically two themes repeated almost verbatim. YIND has at least as many parts and it was credited as a group composition.
Yes, I said FUN. Prog can be Fun. It was the 70's after all.